EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home Home (en) All issues No 150 (2017) Rev. Fr. Geotech., 150 (2017) 3 References
Free Access
Issue
Rev. Fr. Geotech.
Number 150, 2017
Article Number 3
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/2017006
Published online 07 June 2017
  • Arsitaghes P, Autuori P. 2001. Calculs des tunnels au tunnelier. Rev Fr Geotech 97: 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Attewell PB. 1977. Ground movements caused by tunnelling in soil. In: Conference on Large Ground Movements and Structures, Cardiff (United Kingdom), pp. 812–984. [Google Scholar]
  • Clough W, Schmidt B. 1981. Design and performance of excavations and tunnels in soft clay. In: Soft Clay Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific, pp. 569–634. [Google Scholar]
  • Clough GW, Shirasuna T, Finno RJ. 1985. Finite element analysis of advanced shield tunneling. In: 5th Int Conf Numer Methods Geomech, Nagoya (Japan), pp. 1167–1174. [Google Scholar]
  • Dano C. 2014. Étude du creusement de tunnels au tunnelier dans les Argiles Plastiques de la région parisienne. Thèse professionnelle MASTER AFTES. [Google Scholar]
  • Demay B. 2016. Calcul des tunnels au tunnelier sans taux de déconfinement : est-ce possible, voire souhaitable ? In : Journées Nationales de Géotechnique et de Géologie de l'Ingénieur, Nancy (France). [Google Scholar]
  • Dias D. 2011. Convergence–confinement approach for designing tunnel face reinforcement by horizontal bolting. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 26: 517–523. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dias D, Kastner R. 2012. Movements caused by the excavation of tunnels using face pressurized shields − Analysis of monitoring and numerical modeling results. Eng Geol 152: 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Do NA, Dias D, Oreste P, Djeran-Maigre I. 2013. Three-dimensional numerical simulation for mechanized tunnelling in soft ground: the influence of the joint pattern. Acta Geotech 9: 673–694. [Google Scholar]
  • Eclaircy-Caudron S, Dias D, Chantron L, Kastner R. 2006. Numerical modeling of a reinforcement process by umbrella arch. In: International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Construction Processes in Geotechnical Engineering for Urban Environment (NSC06), Bochum (Germany). [Google Scholar]
  • Guilloux A. 2016. Les projets d'ouvrages géotechniques : apports de l'observation et de la modélisation. Rev Fr Geotech 146: 1–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hejazi Y, Dias D, Kastner R. 2008. Impact of constitutive models on the numerical analysis of underground constructions. Acta Geotech 3: 251–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Janin JP. 2012. Tunnels en milieu urbain : prévisions des tassements avec prise en compte des effets de pré-soutènements (renforcement du front de taille et voûte-parapluie). Thèse Doctorat, INSA de Lyon (France). [Google Scholar]
  • Janin JP, Dias D, Kastner R, Emeriault F, Le Bissonnais H, Guilloux A. 2011. Settlement monitoring and tunneling process adaptation − case of South Toulon Tunnel. In: International Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Rome (Italy). [Google Scholar]
  • Janin JP, Martin A, Gastebled O. 2014. 2D and 3D numerical analysis for the design of a TBM dismantling cavern to be excavated under sensitive buildings for Paris metro line extension. In: NUMGE 2014, Delft (Netherlands). [Google Scholar]
  • Janin JP, Dias D, Emeriault F, Kastner R, Le Bissonnais H, Guilloux A. 2015. Numerical back-analysis of the southern Toulon tunnel measurements: a comparison of 3D and 2D approaches. Eng Geol 195: 42–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Janin JP, Renier P, Bergère A, Le Bissonnais H. 2016. Influence of EPB-TBM heading confinement pressure on surface settlements: comparison between 3D FE numerical predictions and in situ measurements. In: The World Tunnel Congress WTC, San Francisco (USA). [Google Scholar]
  • Kastner R, Ollier C, Guibert G. 1996. In situ monitoring of the Lyons metro D line extension. Geotechnical Aspects of Underground construction in Soft Ground. London: Balkema, 701–716 [Google Scholar]
  • Lunardi P. 2008. Design and construction of tunnels − Analysis of controlled deformation in rocks and soils (ADECO-RS). Berlin (Germany): Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • Mair RJ, Taylor RN. 1997. Bored tunnelling in the urban environment. In: Proceeding of the 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Rotterdam: Balkema. [Google Scholar]
  • Möller SC. 2006. Tunnel induced settlements and structural forces in lining. PhD Thesis, Univ Stuttgart, Inst f Geotechnik (Germany). [Google Scholar]
  • Möller SC, Vermeer PA. 2008. On numerical simulation of tunnel installation. Tunn Undergr Spa Tech 23: 461–475. [Google Scholar]
  • Mollon G, Dias D, Soubra A. 2013. Probabilistic analyses of tunneling induced ground movements. Acta Geotech 8: 181–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Reilly MP, New BM. 1982. Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom − their magnitudes and prediction. In: Tunnelling '82. London (England): IMM, pp. 173–181. [Google Scholar]
  • Panet M. 1995. Le calcul des tunnels par la méthode convergence–confinement. Paris : Presse de l'École nationale des Ponts et Chaussées. [Google Scholar]
  • Peck RB. 1969. Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground. In: Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanism Foundation Engineering, Mexico, Vol. 3, pp. 255–290. [Google Scholar]
  • Rankin WI. 1988. Ground movements resulting from urban tunneling: predictions and effects. In: Proc Conf Engineering Geol Underground Movements, Nottingham (England), pp. 79–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmidt B. 1969. Settlements and ground movements associated with tunnelling in soil. Thèse Doctorat, University of Illinois (USA). [Google Scholar]
  • Serratrice JF, Magnan JP. 2002. Analyse et prévision des tassements de surface pendant le creusement du tunnel nord de la traverse souterraine de Toulon. BLPC 237: 5–36. [Google Scholar]
  • Volkmann GM, Button EA, Schubert W. 2006. A contribution to the design of tunnels supported by a pipe roof. In: Proc 41st U.S. Rock Mechanics Symp, American Rock Mech Assoc, Golden, Colorado. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.