EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home Home (en) All issues No 159 (2019) Rev. Fr. Geotech., 159 (2019) 1 References
Free Access
Issue
Rev. Fr. Geotech.
Number 159, 2019
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 20
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/2019013
Published online 30 August 2019
  • Aldridge T, Carrington T, Jardine R, Little R, Evans T, Finnie I. 2010. BP Clair 1 – Pile drivability and capacity in extremely hard till. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, ISFOG, University of Western Australia, Perth, September, Taylor & Francis, London. [Google Scholar]
  • American Petroleum Institute (API). 1969–2007. Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms – Working stress design. API RP 2A-WSD. [Google Scholar]
  • American Petroleum Institute (API). 2014. Recommended practice2GEO. Geotechnical and foundation design considerations, 1st Edition, First addendum. [Google Scholar]
  • ARGEMA. 1988. Capacité portante des pieux. Publié par les Éditions Technip. ISBN 10: 2710805367 / ISBN 13: 9782710805366. [Google Scholar]
  • BP. 2019. BP Energy Outlook: 2019 edition. [Google Scholar]
  • Burland J. 1973. “ Shaft friction on piles in clay – A simple fundamental approach ”, Proc. Ground Eng 6(3): 30–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Burland J. 1993. Closing address. Large scale pile tests. London: Thomas Telford. [Google Scholar]
  • Byrne B, Burd H, Zdravkovic L, et al. 2019. PISA design methods for offshore wind turbine monopiles. Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, Paper 29373. [Google Scholar]
  • Chow F. 1996. Investigations into the displacement pile behaviour for offshore foundations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, Imperial College. [Google Scholar]
  • Clausen C, Aas PM, Karlsrud K. 2005. Bearing capacity of driven piles in sand, the NGI approach. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, ISFOG, University of Western Australia, Perth, 19–21 September, Taylor & Francis, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Damgaard M. 2014. Dynamic properties of offshore wind turbine foundations. Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. [Google Scholar]
  • Fugro Engineers. 2004. Axial pile capacity design method for offshore driven piles in sand, Fugro Report No.: P1003 by A. Baaijens and H.J. Kolk to the American Petroleum Institute, August 5. [Google Scholar]
  • Gavin K, Igoe D, Doherty P. 2011. Piles for offshore wind turbines: A state-of-the-art review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering 164, August, 2011, Issue GE4, pp. 245–256. doi: 10.1680/geng.2011.164.4.245. [Google Scholar]
  • Gilbert R, Chen J-Y., Materek B, et al. 2010. Comparison of observed and predicted performance for jacket pile foundations in hurricanes. Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, Paper 20861. [Google Scholar]
  • Jardine R, Chow F. 2007. Some recent developments in offshore pile design. Proceedings, 6th International Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics Conference, 11–13 September, London, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Jardine R, Chow F, Overy R, Standing J. 2005. ICP design methods for driven piles in sands and clays. London: Imperial College, Thomas Telford Publishing. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeanjean P. 2012. State of practice: Offshore geotechnics throughout the life of an oil and gas field. Keynote Lecture, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 226 Geotechnical Engineering State of the Art and Practice, GeoCongress, Oakland, CA, March. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeanjean P, Hampson K, Evans T, Liedtke E, Clukey E. 2005. An operator’s perspective on offshore risk assessment and geotechnical design in geohazard-prone areas. Keynote Lecture, Proceedings, First International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, Perth, Australia, September. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeanjean P, Watson PG, Kolk HJ, Lacasse S. 2010. RP 2GEO: The new API recommended practice for geotechnical engineering. Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, Paper 20631. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeanjean P, Zakeri A, Al-Khafaji Z, Hampson K, Clukey E, Liedtke E. 2015. Geotechnics for wells top-hole section and conductor. Keynote Lecture, Proceedings, Third International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG), Oslo, Norway, June. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeanjean P, Zhang Y, Zakeri A, Andersen KH, Gilbert R, Senanayake AIMJ. 2017. A framework for monotonic p-y curves in clays. Keynote lecture, Proceedings, Society for Underwater Technology, 8th International Conference on Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics, London, September. [Google Scholar]
  • Kallehave D, Byrne B, Leblanc Thilsted C, Mikkelsen K. 2015. Optimization of monopiles for offshore wind turbines. Phil Trans R Soc A 373: 20140100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karlsrud K. 2012. Prediction of load-displacement behaviour and capacity of axially loaded piles in clay based on analyses and interpretation of pile load test results. Thesis for the degree of Doctor Philosophiae, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, April. [Google Scholar]
  • Karlsrud K, Clausen CJF, Aas PM. 2005. Bearing capacity of driven piles in clay, the NGI approach. Proc. Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, 1. Perth 2005, pp. 775–782. [Google Scholar]
  • Khemakhem M. 2012. Étude expérimentale de la réponse aux charges latérales monotones et cycliques d’un pieu foré dans l’argile. Thèse de Doctorat, École Centrale de Nantes, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Kolk HJ, Baaijens AE, Vergobbi P. 2005. Results from axial load tests on pipe piles in very dense sands: The EURIPIDES JIP. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, ISFOG, University of Western Australia, Perth, 19–21 September, Taylor & Francis, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Kulhawy FH. 1996. Discussion on paper by Fellenius BH, Altaee AA on “critical depth: How it came into being and why it does not exist. Paper 10659 – 1995”. Proc Instn Civ Engrs Geotech Engng 119(Oct): 244–245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lehane B, Schneider JA, Xu X. 2005. A review of design methods of offshore driven piles in siliceous sands. University of Western Australia, Report GEO 05358, September. [Google Scholar]
  • Lehane BM, Lim JK, Carotenuto P, et al. 2017. Characteristics of unified databases for driven piles. Keynote lecture, Proceedings, Society for Underwater Technology, 8th International Conference on Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics, London, September. [Google Scholar]
  • Liedtke E, Andersen KH, Zhang Y, Jeanjean P. 2019. Monotonic and cyclic soil properties of Gulf of Mexico Clays. Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Paper OTC- 29622. [Google Scholar]
  • Litton RW, Stringer ME, Clukey EC, et al. 2014. Centrifuge study of offshore platforms response to earthquake excitations. Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Paper OTC- 25206. [Google Scholar]
  • Matlock H. 1970. Correlations for design of laterally loaded piles in soft clays. OTC 1204, Proc. Offshore Tech. Conf., Houston, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • McClelland B. 1974. Design of deep penetration piles for ocean structures. J Geotech Eng Div, ASCE 100(GT7): 709–747. [Google Scholar]
  • McClelland B, Focht J. 1958. Soil modulus for laterally loaded piles. Trans ASCE 123: 1049–1063. [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell J. 2009. Geotechnical surprises – Or are they? The 2004 H. Bolton Seed Lecture. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(August): 998–1010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Offshore Magazine. 2018. 2018 Deepwater solutions & records for concept selection. Available from https://cdn.offshore-mag.com/files/base/ebm/os/document/2019/06/2018_deepwaterposter_d7out.5cf69289cf748.pdf, accessed June17, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • Olson RE, Dennis ND. 1982. Review and compilation of pile test results – Axial pile capacity. Report to the American Petroleum Institute, Project PRAC-81-29. [Google Scholar]
  • Overy R. 2007. The use of ICP design methods for the foundations of nine platforms installed in the UK North Sea. Proc. 6th Int Conf on Offshore Site Investigations, SUT London, pp 359–366. [Google Scholar]
  • Page AM, Lokke A, Skau K, De Vaal JB. 2019. A family of practical foundation models for dynamic analyses of offshore wind turbines. Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, Paper 29463. [Google Scholar]
  • Pelletier JH, Murff JD, Young AC. 1993. Historical development and assessment of the current API design methods for axially loaded pipes. Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Paper 7157. [Google Scholar]
  • Randolph MF, Houlsby GT. 1984. The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil. Géotechnique 34(4): 613–623. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Randolph MF, Murphy BS. 1985. Shaft capacity of driven piles in clay. Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Paper OTC-4883. [Google Scholar]
  • Randolph MF, Dolwin J, Beck R. 1994. Design of driven piles in sand. Géotechnique 44(3): 427–448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider JA, Xu X, Lehane BM. 2008. Database assessment of CPT based design methods for axial capacity of driven piles in siliceous sands. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(9): 1227–1244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Semple RM, Rigden WJ. 1984. Shaft capacity of driven pipe piles in clay. Proc. Symp. on Analysis and Design of Pile Foundations, ASCE, San Francisco 1984, pp. 59–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Vesic AS. 1970. Test on instrumented piles. Ogeeche River site. J Soil Mech Foundn Engng Div Am Soc Civ Engrs 96(SM2): 561–584. [Google Scholar]
  • Zakeri A, Sturm H, Jeanjean P. 2019. Validation and extension of soil response framework for fatigue analysis of offshore wells and piles. Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Paper OTC-29236. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Y, Andersen KH, Tedesco G. 2016. Ultimate bearing capacity of laterally loaded piles in clay – Some practical considerations. Marine Structures 50(2016): 260–275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Y, Andersen KH, Jeanjean P. 2019. Cyclic p-y curves in clays for offshore structures. Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Paper OTC-29346. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.