Free Access
Review
Issue
Rev. Fr. Geotech.
Number 160, 2019
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 19
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/2019018
Published online 03 January 2020
  • AFNOR. EN ISO 10318. Geosynthetics – Terms and definitions. [Google Scholar]
  • AFNOR. EN ISO 14150. Geosynthetic barriers – Determination of permeability to liquids. [Google Scholar]
  • AFNOR. NF-P 84-500. Géomembranes – Dictionnaire des termes relatifs aux géomembranes. [Google Scholar]
  • AFNOR. NF-P 84-700. Géosynthétiques bentonitiques – Généralités – Définitions. [Google Scholar]
  • Alexander T. 2010. Solar energy landfill caps. Waste Advant Mag 2010: 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Allen S, Sprague CJ. 2011. Carbon footprint implications of the erosion control response. In : Proceedings 24th Annual GRI Conference: Optimizing Sustainability using Geosynthetics, Dallas, TX, USA, pp. 86–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Bathurst R. 2014. Challenges and recent progress in the analysis, design and modelling of geosynthetic reinforced soil walls, The 5th Giroud lecture. In : 10th International Conference on Geosynthetics, 10 ICG, Berlin, Germany, Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Geotechnik (DGGT), Essen, Germany, 40 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Beauregard MS, Krunanithi AT, Clevenger CM. 2016. Comparative life cycle assessment of two design alternatives for a geosynthetic reinforced bridge abutment. In : 3rd Pan American Conference on Geosynthetics, Geoamericas 2016, Miami, FL, USA, pp. 1786–1797. [Google Scholar]
  • Benedetti PF, Fayoux D, Verbrugghe S, Potié G. 2009. Stockage d’eau potable de grande capacité par couverture flottante et géomembrane en PVC – l’expérience corse. In : Rencontres Géosynthétiques 2009, Nantes, France, Comité Français des Géosynthétiques, Rueil-Malmaison, France, 10 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanchet JF. 2017. Les besoins en eau vont augmenter de 14 à 16 % d’ici 2050. In : AgraFil, jeudi 18 au mercredi 24 mai, 4 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanco M, Castillo F, Garcia F, et al. 2012a. Comparative study of three different kinds of geomembranes (PVC-P, HDPE, EPDM) used in the waterproofing of reservoirs. In : Proceedings Eurogeo 5, Valencia, Spain, Vol. 2, pp. 46–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanco M, Leiro A, Soriano J, Crespo M, Zornberg J, Aguiar E. 2012b. Long-term performance of the “Laguna de Barlovento” reservoir waterproofing using a PVC-P geomembrane. In : Proceedings Eurogeo 5, Valencia, Spain, Vol. 2, pp. 55–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouazza A, Heerten G. 2012. Geosynthetic applications – Sustainability aspects. In : Handbook of geosynthetic engineering, 2nd ed. London: ICE. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourdeau PL, Ashwamy AK. 2012. Unpaved roads. In : Handbook of geosynthetic engineering, 2nd ed. London: ICE. [Google Scholar]
  • Boutron O, Gouy V, Touze-Foltz N, Benoit P, Chovelon JM, Margoum C. 2009. Geotextile fibres retention properties to prevent surface water nonpoint contamination by pesticides in agricultural areas. Geotext Geomembr 27: 254–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brandl H. 2010. Geosynthetics application for the mitigation of natural disasters. The 4th Giroud lecture. In : Proceedings 9th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Guaruja, Brazil, pp. 67–112. [Google Scholar]
  • Brooks AE, Allen N, Lonij VP, Cronin AD. 2011. Evaluation of four geomembrane-mounted PV systems for land reclamation in southern Arizona. In : Proceedings 38th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, pp. 520–525. [Google Scholar]
  • Cazzuffi D, Giroud JP, Scuero A, Vaschetti G. 2010. Geosynthetics barriers systems for dams. In : Proceedings 9th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Guaruja, Brazil, pp. 115–163. [Google Scholar]
  • Cazzuffi D, Scuero A, Vaschetti G. 2012. Hydraulic tunnels. In : Handbook of geosynthetic engineering, 2nd ed. London: ICE. [Google Scholar]
  • Christopher B. 2014. Cost savings by using Geosynthetics in the construction of civil work projects. In : 10th International Conference on Geosynthetics, 10 ICG, Berlin, Germany, Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Geotechnik (DGGT), Essen, Germany, 19 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Comte-Sponville A. 1997. De l’autre côté du désespoir. Introduction à la pensée de Svâmi Prajnanpâd. Paris : Accarias / L’Originel. [Google Scholar]
  • Comte-Sponville A. 2006. L’esprit de l’athéisme. Introduction à une spiritualité sans Dieu. Paris : Albin Michel, le Livre de Poche. [Google Scholar]
  • Craggs R, Park J, Sutherland D, Heubeck S. 2015. Economic construction and operation of hectare-scale wastewater treatment enhanced pond systems. J Appl Phycol 27: 1913–1922. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Damians IP, Bathurst RJ, Adroguer E, Josa A, Lloret A. 2016a. Environmental assessment of earth retaining wall structures. ICE Environ Geotech 17. http://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.15.00040. [Google Scholar]
  • Damians IP, Bathurst RJ, Adroguer E, Josa A, Lloret A. 2016b. Sustainability assessment of earth retaining wall structures. ICE Environ Geotech 17. http://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.16.00004. [Google Scholar]
  • DeGarie CJ, Crapper T, Howe BM, Burke BF, Mc Carthy PJ. 2000. Floating geomembrane covers for odour control and biogas collection and utilization in municipal lagoons. Water Sci Technol 42(10-11): 291–298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dixon N, Raja J, Fowmes G, Frost M. 2016. Sustainability aspects of using geotextiles. In : Geotexiles from design to applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Dixon N, Fowmes G, Frost M. 2017. Global challenges, geosynthetic solutions and counting carbon. Geosynth Int 24(5): 451–464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ehrenberg H, Mermet JP, Stucki M, et al. 2012. Comparative life cycle assessment of geosynthetics versus conventional construction materials, a study on behalf of the E.A.G.M. General. In : Proceedings Eurogeo 5, Valencia, Spain, Vol. 4, pp. 87–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Elsing A, Fraser I, Stucki M, et al. 2012. Comparative life cycle assessment of geosynthetics versus conventional construction materials, a study on behalf of the E.A.G.M., Case 2, Foundation stabilization. In : Proceedings Eurogeo 5, Valencia, Spain, Vol. 1, pp. 60–64. [Google Scholar]
  • Farcas F, Fayolle B, Richaud E, Azzouz M. 2012. Phenolic stabilisers extraction constants of polypropylene geotextiles determination in alkali medium. In : Proceedings Eurogeo 5, Valencia, Spain, 5 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Faure YH, Meydiot V. 2002. Secondary function of a complete drainage system: Waterproofing. In : Proceedings 7th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, ISBN 90 5809 525 8, pp. 549–552. [Google Scholar]
  • Forzieri G, Cescatti A, Batista e Silva F, Feyen L. 2017. Increasing risk over time of weather-related hazards to the European population: A data-driven prognostic study. Lancet Planet Health 1: e200–e208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fourmont S, Arab R. 2005. Cover landfill drainage systems. Drainage and waterproofing for semi-permeable landfill capping. In : Proceedings International Workshop Hydro-Physico-Mechanics of Landfills, Grenoble, France, 4 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fourmont S, Castanet E, Desbonnets R, Faivre JM. 2009a. Drainage et imperméabilisation de la couverture du CSD de Saint Bres. In : Rencontres Géosynthétiques 2009, Nantes, France, 5 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fourmont S, Malaret O, Chalot L. 2009b. Réalisation de la couverture de la décharge de la Trompeuse (Martinique). In : Rencontres Géosynthétiques 2009, Nantes, France, 6 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fraser I, Elsing A, Stucki M, et al. 2012. Comparative life cycle assessment of geosynthetics versus conventional construction materials, a study on behalf of the E.A.G.M., Case 4, Soil retaining wall. In : Proceedings Eurogeo 5, Valencia, Spain, Vol. 5, pp. 218–222. [Google Scholar]
  • Futuribles. 2016. Les enquêtes sur les valeurs des Français et des Européens : un outil de prospective social. In : Rencontres Futuribles, Paris, Octobre 2016, Ppt presentation. [Google Scholar]
  • Giroud JP. 2006. A short history of the origins of the IGS. In : Proceedings 8th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  • Giroud JP, Plusquellec H. 2017. Water, canals and geosynthetics. In : Keynote Lecture, Proceedings Geoafrica 2017, Marrakech, Morocco, pp. 53–112. [Google Scholar]
  • Glendinning S, Jones CJFP, Huntley DT, Lamont-Black J. 2006. Dewatering of sewage sludge using electrokinetic geosynthetics. In : Proceedings 8th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 527–530. [Google Scholar]
  • Han J, Guo J. 2017. Geosynthetics used to stabilize vegetated surfaces for environmental sustainability in civil engineering. Front Struc Civil Eng 11(1): 56–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heerten G. 2012. Reduction of climate-damaging gases in geotechnical engineering practice using geosynthetics. Geotext Geomembr 30: 43–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heibaum M. 2010. Geosynthetics in agricultural and aquacultural applications. In : Proceedings 9th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Guaruja, Brazil, pp. 259–271. [Google Scholar]
  • Heibaum M. 2014. Natural disasters mitigation by using construction methods with geosynthetics (flooding). In : Proceedings 10th International Conference on Geosynthetics, 10 ICG, Berlin, Germany, Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Geotechnik (DGGT), Essen, Germany, 16 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Heibaum M, Fourie A, Girard H, Karunaratne GP, Lafleur J, Palmeira EM. 2006. Hydraulic applications of geosynthetics. In : Proceedings 7th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 79–120. [Google Scholar]
  • Hsieh CW. 2008. Using geosynthetics for fishery applications in Taiwan. In : Proceedings of the GRI-21 Conference on Agriculture and Aquaculture, Cancun, Mexico, pp. 84–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Hsieh CW. 2016. Geotextiles in agriculture and aquaculture. In : Geotextiles, from design to applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Huckert A, Briançon L, Villard P, Garcin P. 2016. Load transfer mechanisms in geotextile-reinforced embankments overlying voids: Experimental and analytical approaches. Geotext Geomembr 44(3): 442–456 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • International Geosynthetics Society (IGS)a. Geosynthetics in agricultural applications. [Google Scholar]
  • International Geosynthetics Society (IGS)b. Geosynthetics in railroads. [Google Scholar]
  • IPPC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In : Core writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA, eds. Geneva, Switzerland: IPPC, 151 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones DRV. 2015. Using Geosynthetics for Sustainable development. In : The 2nd International GSI-Asia Geosynthetics Conference (GSI-Asia 2015), Seoul, Korea, 4 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones CJFP, Lamont-Black J, Glendinning S. 2014. The environmental sustainability of electrokinetic geosynthetic strengthened slopes. Eng Sustain 167(ES3): 95–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kant E. 2015. Critique de la faculté de juger. Paris : Flammarion. [Google Scholar]
  • Koerner RM, Hsuan YG, Koerner GR. 2008. Freshwater and geosynthetics: A perfect marriage. In : The first Pan American Geosynthetics Conference and Exhibition, GeoAmericas, pp. 4–28. [Google Scholar]
  • Koerner RM, Hsuan YG, Koerner GR. 2017. Lifetime predictions of exposed geotextiles and geomembranes. Geosynth Int 24(2): 198–212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Laidié N, Shercliff D, Stucki M, et al. 2012. Comparative life cycle assessment of geosynthetics versus conventional construction materials, a study on behalf of the E.A.G.M., case 1, filter function. In : Proceedings Eurogeo 5, Valencia, Spain, Vol. 2, pp. 153–157. [Google Scholar]
  • Land and Water. 2007. Anaerobic digester provides ideal application for EPDM geomembrane. Land Water 2007: 3. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawson CR. 2006. Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering. In : Proceedings 8th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 9–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawson CR. 2014. Dewatering and beneficial reuse of dredged contaminated sediments using geotextile tubes. In : Proceedings 7th International Conference on Environmental Geotechnics, Melbourne, Australia, 25 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawson CR. 2016. Geotextiles in marine engineering. In : Koerner RM, ed. Geotextiles, from design to applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Lenoir F. 2012. La guérison du monde. Ed. Fayard. [Google Scholar]
  • Levita V. 2017. Le réveil économique passera par les infrastructures. Les Echos 22514: 7. [Google Scholar]
  • L’Humanité. 2017. La lutte contre le réchauffement est un facteur de paix évident. In : Interview de Valéry Laramée de Tanneberg, 4th Dec. 2017, 809 words. [Google Scholar]
  • Man TE, Blenesi-Dima A, Constantinescu L. 2010. Technical solution to create esthetical civil engineering structures using the geosynthetics materials. Annals Food Sci Technol 11(1): 111–117. [Google Scholar]
  • Meydiot V, Lambert S. 2000. Influence of joins on transmissivity of drainage geocomposites. In : Proceedings Eurogeo 2, Vol. 2, pp. 773–777. [Google Scholar]
  • Myers SS. 2017. Planetary health: Protecting human health on a rapidly changing planet. Lancet 2017 390: 2860–2868. [Google Scholar]
  • Ng HB, Qi CW, Tan XM. 2009. Covered anaerobic lagoons with HDPE geomembrane experiences in developing Asian countries. In : Proceedings of the International Symposium on Environmental Engineering, Hangzhou, China, pp. 828–833. [Google Scholar]
  • Norberg J. 2016. Non ce n’était pas mieux avant : 10 bonnes raisons d’avoir confiance en l’avenir. Plon, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • OJEC. 1999. Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 182, 16.07.1999, L182/1-L182-19. [Google Scholar]
  • Palma D, Santos-Ferreira A, de Silva P. 2016. Ofir spit (Portugal): An assessment of geotubes performance in coastal protection. In : Proceedings Geotechnics for Sustainable Infrastructure Development – Geotech Hanoi 2016, Hanoi, Vietnam, pp. 983–990. [Google Scholar]
  • Parker G. 2013. Global crisis. War, climate change & catastrophe in the seventeenth century. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0_300-20863-4. [Google Scholar]
  • Peck S. 1978. Le chemin le moins fréquenté. Paris : J’ai lu. [Google Scholar]
  • Peggs ID. 2008. Observations and thoughts on the performance of polypropylene geomembrane liners and floating covers: Towards improved specifications. In : Proceedings Eurogeo 4, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 7 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Perkins SW, Berg RR, Christopher BR. 2012. Paved roads. In : Shukla SK, ed. Handbook of geosynthetic engineering, 2nd ed. London, UK: ICE, pp. 179–192. [Google Scholar]
  • Piorunski R. 1998. Le détour d’un grec par la Chine. Entretien avec François Jullien. Ebisu – Études japonaises 18: 147–185. [Google Scholar]
  • Pons C, Farcas F, Mkademi H, Richaud E, Fayolle B. 2012. Behavior of antioxidants in HDPE geomembranes used in municipal solid waste landfills. In : Proceedings Eurogeo 2012, Valencia, Spain, Vol. 5, pp. 237–244. [Google Scholar]
  • Porter SD, Reay DS. 2015. Addressing food supply chain and consumption inefficiencies: Potential for climate change mitigation. Reg Environ Change 16: 2279–2290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Potočnik J. 2017. Economic model transformation and the role of the bioeconomy. In : Ppt presentation, Berlin, May 10th 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • Poulain D, Touze-Foltz N, Peyras L, Duquennoi C. 2012. Containment ponds, reservoirs and canals. In : Handbook of geosynthetic engineering. London: ICE. [Google Scholar]
  • Raja J, Dixon N, Fowmes G, Frost M, Assinder P. 2015. Obtaining reliable embodied carbon values for geosynthetics. Geosynth Int 22(5): 393–401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramstein G. 2017. L’art est très utile pour penser l’avenir du climat. In : Entretien avec C. My, le Monde, mercredi 15 novembre 2017, 40 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Redón-Santafé M, Ferrer Gisbert PS, Sánchez Romero FJ, et al. 2014. Implementation of a photovoltaic floating cover for irrigation reservoirs. J Clean Prod 66: 568–570. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ritzema HP. 2016. Drain for Gain: Managing salinity in irrigated lands – A review. Agric Water Manag 176: 18–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rowe RK. 2017. Protecting the environment with geosynthetics. In : The 53rd Karl Terzaghi Lecture, ppt presentation (complimentary copy), 100 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Saengrungruang P, Boyd CE. 2014. Evaluation of porous, geotextile liners for erosion control in small aquaculture ponds. North Am J Aquac 76(4): 369–374. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shukla SK, Sivakugan N, Das BM. 2012. Slopes-stabilization. In : Handbook of geosynthetic engineering, 2nd ed. London: ICE. [Google Scholar]
  • Simon J. 1995. The state of humanity: Steadily improving. Cato policy report, 4 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sprague CJ, Sprague JE. 2016. Chapter 24: Geosynthetics in erosion and sediment control. In : Geotextiles, from design to applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Tatsuoka F. 2006. A message from the new IGS president for 2006 to 2010. IGS News 22(3): 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • The Lancet Commission. 2017. The lancet Commission on pollution and health, 58 p. Available from http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0 (last consult.: 2017/19/10). [Google Scholar]
  • Thuan TX. 2013. Le cosmos et le lotus. Paris : Albin Michel. [Google Scholar]
  • Touze-Foltz N. 2010. State of the art and durability insights regarding the use of geosynthetics for lining in hydraulic and environmental applications. In : Proceedings 9th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Guaruja, Brazil, pp. 511–530. [Google Scholar]
  • Touze-Foltz N. 2014. État de l’art sur les contraintes et caractéristiques des solutions techniques par géosynthétiques pour stocker les effluents d’élevage ou eaux chargés (effluents bovins ou volailles). Convention MAAF (DGPPAT / S DIR B&E / BSE) – Irstea. Agriculture et gestion durable de l’eau 2012–2014, Internal report Irstea, 12 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Touze-Foltz N, Lupo J, Barroso M. 2008. Geoenvironmental applications of geosynthetics. In : Keynote Lecture, Proceedings Eurogeo 4, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 98 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Touze-Foltz N, Bannour H, Barral C, Stoltz G. 2016. A review of the performance of geosynthetics for environmental protection. Geotext Geomembr 44: 656–672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Document A/RES/70/1, 35 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanleberghe C. 2017. La montée des eaux va aggraver les inondations. Le Figaro 22721: 6. [Google Scholar]
  • Venkatappa Rao G. 2016. Indian perspectives – achievements and projections. In : Proceedings 6th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics – Geosynthetics for Infrastructure Development, New Delhi, India, pp. HL3–HL36. [Google Scholar]
  • Werth K, Höhny S, Stucki M, et al. 2012. Comparative life cycle assessment of geosynthetics versus conventional construction materials, a study on behalf of the E.A.G.M., Case 3, landfill construction drainage layer. In : Proceedings 5th European Geosynthetics Congress, Valencia, Spain, Vol. 5, pp. 300–303. [Google Scholar]
  • WRAP. 2010. Sustainable geosystems in civil engineering applications, Project MRF116. Banbury, UK: Waste and Resources Action Programme. [Google Scholar]
  • Zornberg JG. 2017a. Functions and applications of geosynthetics in roadways – Part 2. Geosynth Mag 2017: 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Zornberg JG. 2017b. Functions and applications of geosynthetics in roadways – Part 1. Geosynth Mag 2017: 34–41. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.