Free Access
Issue
Rev. Fr. Geotech.
Number 165, 2020
Microstructure des matériaux argileux – conséquences pour l’ingénieur
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 20
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/2020025
Published online 26 January 2021
  • Bai X, Smart R. 1997. Change in microstructure of kaolin in consolidation and undrained shear. Géotechnique 47(5): 1009–1017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barton CM. 1974. The micromorphological soil investigation work of Dr. Lafeber. In: Rutherford GK, ed. Soil Microscopy. Kingston, Ontario: The Limestone Press, pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Bésuelle P, Viggiani G, Desrues J, Coll C, Charrier P. 2014. A laboratory experimental study of the hydromechanical behavior of Boom clay. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(1): 143–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Biarez J, Hicher PY. 1994. Elementary Mechanics of Soils Behaviour. Saturated Remoulded Soils. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema. [Google Scholar]
  • Delage P. 2010. A microstructure approach to the sensitivity and compressibility of some Eastern sensitive clays. Géotechnique 60(5): 353–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geot.2010.60.5.353. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Delage P, Lefebvre G. 1984. Study of the structure of a sensitive Champlain clay and of its evolution during consolidation. Can Geotech J 21(1): 21–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Delage P, Pellerin FM. 1984. Influence de la lyophilisation sur la structure d’une argile sensible du Québec. Clay Miner 19(2): 151–160. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gao Q-F, Hattab M, Jrad M, Fleureau J-M, Hicher P-Y. 2019. Microstructural organisation of remoulded clays in relation with dilatancy/contractancy phenomena. En cours de publication. Acta Geotech. [Google Scholar]
  • Hammad T, Fleureau J-M, Hattab M. 2013. Kaolin/montmorillonite mixtures behaviour on oedometric path and microstructural variations. Eur J Environ Civil Eng 17(9): 826–840. DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2013.822428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hattab M. 2011. Critical state notion and microstructural considerations in clays. C R Mec 339(11): 719–726. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hattab M, Favre J-L. 2010. Analysis of the experimental compressibility of deep water marine sediments from the Gulf of Guinea. Mar Petrol Geol 27(2): 486–499. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hattab M, Fleureau JM. 2010. Experimental study of kaolin particle orientation mechanism. Géotechnique 60(5): 323–331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hattab M, Hicher PY. 2004. Dilating behaviour of overconsolidated clay. Soils Found 44(4): 27–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hattab M, Bouziri-Adrouche S, Fleureau JM. 2010. Évolution de la microtexture d’une matrice kaolinitique sur chemin triaxial axisymétrique. Can Geotech J 47(1): 34–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hattab M, Hammad T, Fleureau JM. 2015. Internal friction angle variation in a kaolin/montmorillonite clay mix and microstructural identification. Géotechnique 65(1): 1–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hicher PY, Wahyudi H, Tessier D. 2000. Microstructural analysis of inherent and induced anisotropy in clay. Mech Cohes-Friction Mater 5(5): 341–371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kawaragi C, Yoneda T, Sato T, Kaneko K. 2009. Microstructure of saturated bentonites characterized by X-ray CT observations. Eng Geol 106(1): 51–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pusch R. 1970. Microstructural changes in soft quick clay at failure. Can Geotech J 7(1): 1–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Terzaghi K. 1925. Erdbaumechanik auf bodenphysikalischer Grundlage. F Deutsche Presse, Leipzig und Wien (in German). [Google Scholar]
  • Viggiani G, Lenoir N, Bésuelle P, et al. 2004. X-ray microtomography for studying localized deformation in fine-grained geomaterials under triaxial compression. C R Mec 332(10): 819–826. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.