EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home Home (en) All issues No 168 (2021) Rev. Fr. Geotech., 168 (2021) 3 References
Free Access
Issue
Rev. Fr. Geotech.
Number 168, 2021
Modélisation Physique en Géotechnique - Partie 2
Article Number 3
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/2021013
Published online 21 April 2021
  • Almeida MSS, Almeida MCF, Trejo PCN, et al. 2014. The geotechnical beam centrifuge at COPPE geotechnical laboratory. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Perth. Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. London: Taylor and Francis Group, pp. 271–277. [Google Scholar]
  • Bruton DAS, White DJ, Cheuk C, Bolton M, Carr M. 2006. Pipe/soil interaction behavior during lateral buckling, including large-amplitude cyclic displacement tests by the Safebuck JIP. In: Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4043/17944-MS. [Google Scholar]
  • Bruton DAS, White DJ, Carr M, Cheuk JCY. 2008. Pipe-soil interaction during lateral buckling and pipeline walking – The SAFEBUCK JIP. In: Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4043/19589-MS. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardoso CO, Silveira RMS. 2010. Pipe-soil interaction behaviour for pipelines under large displacements on clay soils – A model for lateral residual friction factor. In: Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardoso CO, Amaral CS, Ochi VT. 2015. The soil strength degradation influence in the axial pipe-soil. In: Proceedings of the Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics III, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 381–386. [Google Scholar]
  • Chatterjee S, White DJ, Randolph MF. 2012. Numerical simulations of pipe-soil interaction during large lateral movements on clay. Géotechnique 62(8): 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.107. [Google Scholar]
  • Cheuk CY, White DJ. 2010. Modelling the dynamic embedment of seabed pipelines. Géotechnique. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.148. [Google Scholar]
  • Cheuk CY, White DJ, Bolton MD. 2007a. Large-scale modelling of soil-pipe interaction during large amplitude movements of partially-embedded pipelines. Can Geotech J 44(8): 977–996. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-037. [Google Scholar]
  • Cheuk CY, Take AW, Bolton MD, Oliveira JRMS. 2007b. Soil restraint on buckling oil and gas pipelines in lumpy clay fill. Eng Struct 29: 973–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.027. [Google Scholar]
  • Cocjin ML, Gourvenec SM, White DJ. 2018. Softening and consolidation around seabed pipelines: centrifuge modelling. Géotechnique 68(2). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.280. [Google Scholar]
  • Dendani H, Jaeck C. 2007. Pipe-soil interaction in highly plastic clays. In: Proceedings of the International Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics Conference, Vol. 21(4), pp. 1166–1171. [Google Scholar]
  • Dingle HRC, White DJ, Gaudin C. 2008. Mechanisms of pipe embedment and lateral breakout on soft clay. Can Geotech J 45: 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-009. [Google Scholar]
  • Kong D, Martin CM, Byrne B. 2017. Sequential limit analysis of pipe-soil interaction during large-amplitude cyclic lateral displacements. Géotechnique. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.256. [Google Scholar]
  • Kong D, Zhu J, Wu L, Zhu B. 2020. Break-out resistance of offshore pipelines buried in inclined clayey seabed. J Appl Ocean Res 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.102007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee YS, Smith CC, Cheuk CY. 2011. Lateral breakout resistance of shallowly embedded offshore pipelines. Proc Eng 14: 1690–1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.212. [Google Scholar]
  • Lukiantchuki JA, Oliveira JRMS, Pessin J, Almeida MSS. 2018. Centrifuge modelling of traffic simulation on a construction waste layer. Int J Phys Model Geotech 18(6): 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.17.00012. [Google Scholar]
  • Manivannan R, Wong JC, Leung CF, Tan SA. 1998. Consolidation characteristics of lumpy fill. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Centrifuge 98, Tokyo, Vol. 1, pp. 889–894. [Google Scholar]
  • Merifield RS, White DJ, Randolph MF. 2009. The effect of surface heave on the response of partially embedded pipelines on clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(6): 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000070. [Google Scholar]
  • Morris DV, Webb RE. 1988. Self-burial of laterally loaded offshore pipelines in weak sediments. In: Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, pp. 421–428. [Google Scholar]
  • Oliphant J, Maconochie A, White DJ, Bolton M. 2009. Trench interaction forces during lateral scr movement in deepwater clays. In: Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 19944. [Google Scholar]
  • Oliveira JRMS, Almeida MSS, Almeida MCF, Borges RG. 2010. Physical modeling of lateral clay-pipe interaction. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 136(7): 950–956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT1943-5606.0000311. [Google Scholar]
  • Oliveira JRMS, Almeida MSS, Motta HPG, Almeida MCF. 2011. Influence of penetration rate on penetrometer resistance. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 137(7): 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000480. [Google Scholar]
  • Rammah KI, Oliveira JRMS, Almeida MCF, Almeida MSS, Borges RG. 2014. Centrifuge modelling of a buried pipeline below an embankment. Int J Phys Model Geotech 14: 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.14.00006. [Google Scholar]
  • Randolph MF. 2012. Offshore geotechnics – The challenges of deepwater soft sediments. In: Geotechnical Engineering State of the Art and Practice: Keynote lectures from GeoCongress 2012, California, USA, pp. 241–271. [Google Scholar]
  • Randolph MF, Hope S. 2004. Effect of cone velocity on cone resistance and excess pore pressures. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Engineering Practice and Performance of Soft Deposits, Yodogawa Kogisha, Osaka, Japan, pp. 147–152. [Google Scholar]
  • Rismanchian A, White DJ, Randolph MF, Martin CM. 2019. Shear strength of soil berm during lateral buckling of subsea pipelines. J Appl Ocean Res 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.101864. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider JA, Lehane BM, Schnaid F. 2007. Velocity effects on piezocone measurements in normally and over consolidated clays. Int J Phys Model Geotech 7(2): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2007.070202. [Google Scholar]
  • Verley R, Lund KM. 1995. A soil resistance model for pipelines placed on clay soils. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering ASME, Pipeline Technology, New York, Vol. 5, pp. 225–232. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang L, Li K, Yuan F. 2017. Lateral cyclic interaction between catenary riser and soft seabed. J Appl Ocean Res 63: 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  • White DJ, Cheuk CY. 2008. Modelling the soil resistance on seabed pipelines during large cycles of lateral movement. J Marine Struct 21(1): 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2007.05.001. [Google Scholar]
  • White DJ, Clukey EC, Randolph MF, et al. 2017. The state of knowledge of pipe-soil interaction for on-bottom pipeline design. In: Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, OTC-27623-MS. [Google Scholar]
  • You J, Biscontin G, Aubeny CP. 2008. Seafloor interaction with steel catenary risers. In: Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Vol. 8(510), pp. 110–117. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.