EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Home All issues No 151 (2017) Rev. Fr. Geotech., 151 (2017) 3 References
Free Access
Issue
Rev. Fr. Geotech.
Number 151, 2017
Article Number 3
Number of page(s) 19
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/2017007
Published online 30 June 2017
  • Alonso EE, Pineda JA, Cardoso R. 2010. Degradation of marls: two case studies from the Iberian Peninsula. Eng Geol Special Pub 23: 47–75. [Google Scholar]
  • Amorosi A, Rampello S. 2007. An experimental investigation into the mechanical behaviour of a structured stiff clay. Géotechnique 57(2): 153–166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anagnostopoulos AG, Kalteziotis N, Tsiambaos GK, Kavvadas M. 1991. Geotechnical properties of the Corinth Canal marls. Geotech Geol Eng 9(1): 1–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Aversa S, Evangelista A, Leroueil S, Picarelli L. 1993. Some aspects of the mechanical behaviour of ‘structured’ soils and soft rocks. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils and Soft Rocks, Athens, Vol. 1, pp. 359–366. [Google Scholar]
  • Bekkouche A, Djeddid A, Aissa Mamoune SM. 2002. Identification et prévision du gonflement des marnes de Tlemcen (Algérie). In: Actes du Symposium International PARAM 2002, Paris, pp. 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  • Biarez J, Hicher PY. 1994. Elementary Mechanics of Soil Behaviour. Rotterdam: AA. Balkema. [Google Scholar]
  • Bishop AW. 1971. Shear strength parameters for undistributed and remolded soil specimens. In: Proceedings of the Roscoe Memorial Symposium on Stress Strain Behavior of Soils, Cambridge, pp. 3–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Bishop AW, Webb DL, Lewin PI. 1965. Undisturbed samples of London clay from Ashford Common shaft: strength − effective stress relationship. Géotechnique 15(1): 1–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boudlal O, Khattaoui M, Kichi H. 2014. Caractérisation des marnes de la Grande Kabylie (Algérie). In: Actes des Journées Nationales de Géotechnique et de Géologie de l'Ingénieur JNGG2014, Beauvais. [Google Scholar]
  • Burland JB. 1990. On the compressibility and shear strength of natural soils. Géotechnique 40(3): 329–378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burland JB, Rampello S, Georgiannou VN, Calabresi G. 1996. A laboratory study of the strength of four stiff clays. Géotechnique 46(3): 491–514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cafaro F, Cotecchia F. 2001. Structure degradation and changes in the mechanical behaviour of a stiff clay due to weathering. Géotechnique 51(5): 441–453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Callisto L, Rampello S. 2004. An interpretation of structural degradation for three natural clays. Can Geotech J 4(3): 392–407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chandler RJ. 1969. The effect of weathering on the shear strength properties of Keuper marl. Géotechnique 19(3): 321–334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chandler RJ. 1972. Lias clay: weathering processes and their effect on shear strength. Géotechnique 22(4): 403–431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chandler RJ, Apted JP. 1988. The effect of weathering on the strength of London Clay. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 21: 59–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clayton CRI, Serratrice JF. 1993. The mechanical properties and behaviour of hard soils and soft rocks. Rapport général de la session 2. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils and Soft Rocks, Athens, Vol. 3, pp. 1839–1877. [Google Scholar]
  • Collins K, Mc Gown A. 1974. The form and function of microfabric features in a variety of natural soils. Géotechnique 24(2): 223–254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costa Filho LM. 1984. Technical note: a note on the influence of fissures on the deformation characteristics of London Clay. Géotechnique 34(2): 268–272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cotecchia F, Chandler RJ. 1997. The influence of structure on the pre-failure behaviour of a natural clay. Géotechnique 47(3): 523–544. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cotecchia F, Chandler RJ. 2000. A general framework for the mechanical behaviour of clays. Géotechnique 50(4): 431–447. [Google Scholar]
  • Cotecchia F, Cafaro F, Aresta B. 2007. Structure and mechanical response of sub-Apennine Blue Clays in relation to their geological and recent loading history. Géotechnique 57(2): 167–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Croce A, Japelli R, Pellegrino A, Viggiani C. 1969. Compressibility and strength of stiff intact clays. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico, Vol. 1, pp. 81–89. [Google Scholar]
  • Crooks JHA, Graham J. 1976. Geotechnical properties of the Belfast estuarine deposits. Géotechnique 26(2): 293–315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dehandschutter B, Vandycke S, Sintubin M, Vandenberghe N, Wouters L. 2005. Brittle fractures and ductile shear bands in argillaceous sediments: inferences from Oligocene Boom Clay (Belgium). J Struct Geol 27(6): 1095–1112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Delage P, Lefebvre G. 1984. Study of the structure of a sensitive Champlain clay and its evolution during consolidation. Can Geotech J 21(1): 21–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Derriche Z, Cheikh-Lounis G. 2004. Caractéristiques géotechniques des marnes plaisanciennes d'Alger. Bull Eng Geol Environ 63: 367–378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Djedid A, Bekkouche A, Aissa Mammoune SM. 2001. Identification et prévision du gonflement de quelques sols de la région de Tlemcen (Algerie). Bull Lab Ponts Chaussée 233: 67–75. [Google Scholar]
  • Donath F. Strength variation and deformational behavior in transversely isotropic rock. In : Judd WR, ed. State of stress in the earth's crust. New York: Elsevier, 1964, pp. 281–298. [Google Scholar]
  • Ejjaaouani H, Shakhirev V, Magnan JP, Bensallam S. 2013. Comportement des sols gonflants lors de l'humidification et du séchage. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris, pp. 1101–1104. [Google Scholar]
  • El Amrani N, Chacon J. 1996. Altérabilité, gonflement et propriétés d'indices des marnes néogènes de la dépression de Grenade (sud de l'Espagne). Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 54: 77–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fabre G. 2005. Fluage et endommagement des roches argileuses : évolution de la microstructure et modélisation phénoménologique. Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, 330 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fabre G, Pellet F. 2006. Creep and time-dependent damage in argillaceous rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43: 950–960. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gasparre A, Nishimura S, Coop MR, Jardine RJ. 2007. The influence of structure on the behaviour of London clay. Géotechnique 57(1): 19–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gasparre A, Nishimura S, Minh NA, Coop MR, Jardine RJ. 2007. The stiffness of natural London Clay. Géotechnique 57(1): 33–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gasparre A, Coop MR. 2008. Quantification of the effects of structure on the compression of a stiff clay. Can Geotech J 45(9): 1324–1334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaudin D. 1972. Pressions de terrain sur une galerie creusée dans des marnes du Stampien. Bull Liaison Ponts Chaussées 59: 133–155. [Google Scholar]
  • Gaudin B, Serratrice JF. 1998. Étude en laboratoire du comportement mécanique d'une molasse. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Hard Soils and Soft Rocks, Naples, pp. 173–181. [Google Scholar]
  • Gaudin B, Folacci JP, Panet M, Salva L. 1981. Soutènement d'une galerie dans des marnes noires du Cénomanien. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, Vol. 1/4, pp. 293–296. [Google Scholar]
  • Graham J, Houlsby CTH. 1983. Anisotropic elasticity of a natural clay. Géotechnique 33(2): 165–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Graham J, Noonan ML, Lew KV. 1983. Yield states and stress-strain relationships in a natural plastic clay. Can Geotech J 20(3): 502–516 [Google Scholar]
  • Guilloux A, Cojean R, Doré M, et al. 2005. Note sur la définition des « Sols Indurés Roches Tendres » (SIRT). Rev Fr Géotech 111: 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  • Hight DW, McMillan F, Powell JJM, Jardine RJ, Allenou CP. 2002. Some characterictics of London Clay. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, Singapore, Vol. 2, pp. 851–908. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoek E, Brown ET. 1980. Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J Geotech Eng-ASCE 106(9): 1013–1035. [Google Scholar]
  • Houlsby GT, Wroth CP. 1991. The variation of the shear modulus of a clay with pressure and overconsolidation ratio. Soils Found 31(3): 138–143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jaeger JC. 1960. Shear failure of transversely isotropic rock. Geol Mag 97: 65–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jamiolkowski M, Lancellotta R, Lo Presti D. 1995. Remarks on the stiffness at small strains of six Italian clays. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium Pre-failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, IS-Hokkaido, Sapporo, pp. 817–836. [Google Scholar]
  • Kavvadas M, Anagnostopoulos A, Kalteziotis N. 1993. A framework for the mechanical behaviour of the Corinth marl. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Hard Soils − Soft Rocks, Athens, Vol. 1, pp. 577–584. [Google Scholar]
  • Lamas F, Oteo C, Chacóna J. 2011. Influence of carbonate content on the stress-strength behaviour of neogene marls from the betic cordillera (Spain) in cu triaxial tests using a quasilinear elastic (hyperbolic) model. Eng Geol 122(3–4): 160–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee YL, Arafati N, Leca E, Magnan JP, Mestat P, Serratrice JF. 1993. Comportement et modélisation des marnes de Las Planas. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils and Soft Rocks, Athens, Vol. 2, pp. 1479–1486. [Google Scholar]
  • Leroueil S, Vaughan PR. 1990. The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks. Géotechnique 40(3): 467–488. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Le Roux A. 1971. Le microscope électronique à balayage: application à l'étude des marnes. Bull Lab Ponts Chaussée 54: 6–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Roux A. 1972. Caractéristiques mécaniques des roches argileuses en relation avec leur texture. Bull Lab Ponts Chaussée 61: 155–178. [Google Scholar]
  • Liao JJ, Yang MT, Hsieh HY. 1997. Direct tensile behavior of a transversely isotropic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(5): 831–849. [Google Scholar]
  • Lings ML, Pennigton DS, Nash DF. 2000. Anisotropic stiffness parameters and their measurement in a stiff natural clay. Géotechnique 50(2): 109–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu X, Buzzi O, Yuan S, Mendes J, Fityus S. 2016. Multi-scale characterization of retention and shrinkage behaviour of four Australian clayey soils. Can Geotech J 53(5): 854–870. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Magnan JP, Serratrice JF. 1995. Détermination de la courbe d'état limite d'une marne. In: Proceedings on the 11th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Copenhague, Vol. 3, pp. 1839–1847. [Google Scholar]
  • Maquaire O, Malet JP, Remaître A, Locat J, Klotz S, Guillon J. 2003. Instability conditions of marly hillslopes: towards landsliding or gullying? The case of the Barcelonnette Basin, South East France. Eng Geol 70: 109–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marsland A. 1971. The shear strength of stiff fissured clays. Stress-strains behaviour of soils. In: Proceedings of the Roscoe Memorial Symposium on Stress Strain Behavior of Soils, pp. 59–68. [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell JK. 1976. Fundamentals of soil behavior. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  • Mouhssine M, Touzani A, Zinoune S, Mahtal A. 2015. Terrassements sur terrains marneux sensibles aux glissements : cas des terrains et remblais autoroutiers entre Oued Amlil et Taza (Rif, Maroc). Physio-Géo 9(1): 61–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Nasseri MH, Rao K, Ramamurthy T. 2003. Transversely isotropic strength and deformational behavior of Himalayan schists. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(1): 3–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pejon OJ, Le Roux A, Guignard D. 1997. Comportement à l'eau des roches argilo-marneuses, suivi du gonflement, importance de laminéralogie et des textures. Bull Assoc Int Géol Ing 55: 105–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Picarelli L, Urciuoli G, Mandolini A, Ramondini M. 2006. Softening and instability of natural slopes in highly fissured plastic clay shales. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6: 529–539. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Raynaud S, Ngan-Tillard D, Desrues J, Mazerolle F. 2008. Brittle-to-ductile transition in Beaucaire marl from triaxial tests under the CT-scanner. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45(5): 653–671. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Serrano AA, Oteo C, Dapena E, Vinas JM. 1981. Analysis of swelling phenomena in a gypsum-marl formation. In: Proceedings of the l0th International Conference Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, Vol. 1/4, pp. 779–784. [Google Scholar]
  • Serratrice JF, 1995. Essais de laboratoire à haute pression sur une marne. In: Actes du Colloquium Mundanum Craies et Schistes, Bruxelles, pp. 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Serratrice JF. 1998. Caractéristiques mécaniques des marnes de l'Oligocène du bassin de Marseille. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Hard Soils and Soft Rocks, Naples, pp. 301–310. [Google Scholar]
  • Serratrice JF. 2002. Outils et procédures de caractérisation des sols indurés et des roches tendres : l'expérience du LRPC d'Aix-en-Provence. In: Actes du Symposium International PARAM 2002, Paris, pp. 313–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Serratrice JF. 2011. Propriétés mécaniques d'une marne. In: Proceedings on the 15th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Athènes, pp. 459–464. [Google Scholar]
  • Serratrice JF. 2013. Essais triaxiaux sur des marnes fissurées. In: Actes des 3ème Conférence Maghrébine en Ingénierie Géotechnique GMIG'13, Alger, pp. 345–350. [Google Scholar]
  • Serratrice JF, Calissano H, Batilliot L. 2012. Résistances triaxiales d'une marne et de son argile d'altération. In: Actes des Journées Nationales de Géotechnique et de Géologie de l'ingénieur JNGG 2012, Bordeaux, pp. 427–434. [Google Scholar]
  • Sivakumar V, Doran IG, Graham J, Johnson A. 2001. The effect of anisotropic elasticity on the yielding characteristics of overconsolidated natural clay. Can Geotech J 38(1): 125–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skempton AW. 1970. First-time slides in overconsolidated clays. Géotechnique 20(3): 320–324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skempton AW, Petley DJ. 1967. The strength along structural discontinuities in stiff clays. In: Proceedings of the Geotechnical Conference, Oslo, Vol. 2, pp. 29–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Skempton AW, Schuster FRS, Petley DJ. 1969. Joints and fissures in the London clay at Wraysbury and Edgware. Géotechnique 19(2): 205–217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tavenas F, Leroueil S. 1977. Effects of stresses and time on yielding of clays. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Vol. 1, pp. 319–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Tavenas F, Leroueil F. 1979. Les concepts d'état limite et d'état critique et leurs applications pratiques à l'étude des argiles. Rev Fr Géotech 6: 27–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Tillard-Ngan D, Desrues J, Raynaud S, Mazerolle F. 1993. Strain localisation in Beaucaire marl. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils and Soft Rocks, Athens, Vol. 2, pp. 679–1686. [Google Scholar]
  • Tran TD. 2014. Rôle de la microstructure des sols argileux dans les processus de retrait-gonflement : de l'échelle de l'éprouvette à l'échelle de la chambre environnementale. Thèse de Doctorat, école Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, ParisTech, 216 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Vitone C, Cotecchia F. 2011. The influence of intense fissuring on the mechanical behaviour of clays. Géotechnique 61(12): 1003–1018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang C, Carter JP, Sheng D. 2014. Description of compression behaviour of structured soils and its application. Can Geotech J 51(8): 921–933. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.